| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000-01 | West Kelowna Warriors | BCHL | 50 | 8 | 22 | 30 | 0.600 | 0.2235 | 0.2493 | 0.8743 | 0.9754 |
| 2001-02 | West Kelowna Warriors | BCHL | 50 | 29 | 47 | 76 | 1.520 | 0.5662 | 0.6005 | 2.2148 | 2.3488 |
| 2013-14 | Örebro HK | SHL | 35 | 2 | 13 | 15 | 0.429 | 1.0715 | 0.8819 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-05 | UMass Lowell | D1 | HockeyEast | JR | 36 | 26 | 13 | 39 | 1.083 |
| 2003-04 | UMass Lowell | D1 | HockeyEast | SO | 36 | 18 | 16 | 34 | 0.944 |
| 2002-03 | UMass Lowell | D1 | HockeyEast | FR | 35 | 5 | 12 | 17 | 0.486 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.