IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyson Terry Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1982-04-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 58 8 18 26 0.448 0.1727 0.1749 0.6532 0.6614
2001-02 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 49 8 13 21 0.429 0.1651 0.1581 0.6245 0.5979
2002-03 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 49 12 36 48 0.980 0.3774 0.3450 1.4274 1.3049
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SR 25 4 14 18 0.720
2005-06 SUNY Geneseo D3 — JR 24 2 8 10 0.417
2004-05 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — SO 9 1 1 2 0.222
2003-04 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — FR 15 0 3 3 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2003-04 · Wisconsin-Superior
-13.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20550
Forward overall
#606
Forward born in 1982
#1020
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bryan Yim
Adrian · 2014-15
1.138 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bates Ling
New England College · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Kailin Chen
UMass Dartmouth · 2024-25
1.454 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.