IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Scofield Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-08-15 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Starbulls Rosenheim · DEL2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Vernon Vipers BCHL 51 13 7 20 0.392 0.1511 0.1706 0.5708 0.6443
2001-02 — BCHL 50 19 28 47 0.940 0.3622 0.3889 1.3680 1.4688
2002-03 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 49 28 38 66 1.347 0.5190 0.5348 1.9601 2.0197
2003-04 — BCHL 52 30 34 64 1.231 0.4742 0.4675 1.7912 1.7660
2004-05 Northern Manitoba Blizzard MJHL 44 40 25 65 1.477 0.2844 0.2679 0.9316 0.8776
2016-17 Starbulls Rosenheim DEL2 47 25 30 55 1.170 1.5676 1.2703 2.0998 1.7015
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Bemidji State D1 CCHA SR 35 22 17 39 1.114
2007-08 Bemidji State D1 CCHA JR 30 13 13 26 0.867
2006-07 Bemidji State D1 CCHA SO 27 7 14 21 0.778
2005-06 Bemidji State D1 CCHA FR 37 6 19 25 0.676
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2005-06 · Bemidji State
+127.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6857
Forward overall
#218
Forward born in 1984

D2/3 Comparables

Tim Coffman
Utica · 2023-24
1.480 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Bloom
University of New England · 2016-17
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Armour
Adrian · 2014-15
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.