← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Scofield Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-08-15 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Starbulls Rosenheim · DEL2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Vernon Vipers BCHL 51 13 7 20 0.392 0.1461 0.1649 0.5715 0.6451
2001-02 BCHL 50 19 28 47 0.940 0.3501 0.3759 1.3697 1.4706
2002-03 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 49 28 38 66 1.347 0.5017 0.5170 1.9626 2.0223
2003-04 BCHL 52 30 34 64 1.231 0.4585 0.4520 1.7934 1.7681
2004-05 Northern Manitoba Blizzard MJHL 44 40 25 65 1.477 0.4017 0.3784 0.9310 0.8770
2016-17 Starbulls Rosenheim DEL2 47 25 30 55 1.170 0.5048 0.4091
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Bemidji State D1 SR 35 22 17 39 1.114
2007-08 Bemidji State D1 JR 30 13 13 26 0.867
2006-07 Bemidji State D1 SO 27 7 14 21 0.778
2005-06 Bemidji State D1 FR 37 6 19 25 0.676
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2005-06 · Bemidji State
+93.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6499
Forward overall
#201
Forward born in 1984

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2005-06
1.033 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2011-12
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.