IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sheldon Wing Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1983-07-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1926 0.2073 0.7286 0.7843
2001-02 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 60 7 23 30 0.500 0.1281 0.1342 0.3705 0.3882
2002-03 Melfort Mustangs SJHL 60 15 33 48 0.800 0.2050 0.2038 0.5929 0.5893
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 St. Norbert D3 — SR 11 2 7 9 0.818
2005-06 St. Norbert D3 — JR 32 7 16 23 0.719
2004-05 St. Norbert D3 — SO 21 1 15 16 0.762
2003-04 St. Norbert D3 — FR 30 4 15 19 0.633
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.63
2003-04 · St. Norbert
+281.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6295
Defenseman overall
#787
Defenseman born in 1983

D1 Comparables

Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Mike McKee
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Niklas Nevalainen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Morgan
New England · 2016-17
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Nelson
St. Scholastica · 2003-04
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Paul Conter
Southern Maine · 2005-06
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.