← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor May Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-08-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 OJHL 51 10 9 19 0.372 0.1041 0.1069 0.2571 0.2641
2018-19 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 47 15 21 36 0.766 0.2140 0.2094 0.5286 0.5172
2019-20 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 54 25 41 66 1.222 0.3415 0.3415 0.8434 0.8434
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Adrian D3 NCHA GR 27 1 12 13 0.481
2023-24 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 32 8 16 24 0.750
2022-23 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 20 4 9 13 0.650
2021-22 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 14 2 2 4 0.286
2020-21 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 23 12 6 18 0.783
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.78
2020-21 · Adrian
+442.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14914
Forward overall
#528
Forward born in 1999
#914
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Bentley (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Olaf · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Chatham · 2017-18
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2018-19
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.