← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Darby Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-08-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 New Jersey Rockets EHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 New York Bobcats EHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 East Coast Wizards EHL 27 16 19 35 1.296 0.2782 0.2820 0.6348 0.6434
2019-20 East Coast Wizards EHL 35 16 19 35 1.000 0.2146 0.2146 0.4897 0.4897
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SR 12 3 0 3 0.250
2022-23 St. Olaf D3 MIAC JR 18 2 7 9 0.500
2021-22 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SO 21 6 7 13 0.619
2020-21 St. Olaf D3 MIAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

60%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
30%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15557
Forward overall
#560
Forward born in 1999
#78
in EHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Bentley (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2017-18
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2003-04
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.