IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Burton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-03-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 9 5 4 9 1.000 0.3725 0.4105 1.4571 1.6059
2002-03 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 57 25 45 70 1.228 0.4575 0.4844 1.7895 1.8949
2003-04 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 60 30 80 110 1.833 0.6829 0.6927 2.6713 2.7098
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Colgate D1 ECAC SR 42 23 18 41 0.976
2006-07 Colgate D1 ECAC JR 40 18 22 40 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.57
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2006-07 · Colgate
+76.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3990
Forward overall
#147
Forward born in 1985
#19
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Peter Quenneville
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.80 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Toninato
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.67 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dennis Kravchenko
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ UMass (0.92 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Frank Vatrano
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UMass
0.61 No data
NCAAe PPG
Vinnie Hinostroza
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.30 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.94 D1 FR PPG)
0.80 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Reifler
Elmira · 2017-18
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Geordan Buffoline
New England · 2017-18
1.667 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Signoretti
Buffalo State · 2023-24
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.