IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cam MacIntyre Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-10-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 51 3 4 7 0.137 0.0529 0.0598 0.2001 0.2262
2002-03 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 59 4 17 21 0.356 0.1371 0.1490 0.5186 0.5638
2003-04 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 59 15 23 38 0.644 0.2482 0.2588 0.9385 0.9785
2004-05 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 53 14 16 30 0.566 0.2181 0.2172 0.8247 0.8214
2005-06 — BCHL 60 41 34 75 1.250 0.4816 0.4555 1.8214 1.7227
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Princeton D1 ECAC SR 10 6 4 10 1.000
2008-09 Princeton D1 ECAC JR 14 1 5 6 0.429
2007-08 Princeton D1 ECAC SO 31 13 18 31 1.000
2006-07 Princeton D1 ECAC FR 32 9 4 13 0.406
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2006-07 · Princeton
+31.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12851
Forward overall
#396
Forward born in 1985
#465
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mark Loza
Suffolk · 2001-02
1.308 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Powell
Elmira · 2015-16
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Skylur Jameson
Wentworth · 2007-08
1.778 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.