| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002-03 | Chilliwack Chiefs | BCHL | 59 | 34 | 55 | 89 | 1.508 | 0.5619 | 0.5945 | 2.1980 | 2.3256 |
| 2009-10 | Augsburger Panther | DEL | 56 | 26 | 34 | 60 | 1.071 | 1.1717 | 1.3093 | — | — |
| 2010-11 | Augsburger Panther | DEL | 48 | 23 | 47 | 70 | 1.458 | 1.5948 | 1.7536 | — | — |
| 2011-12 | Eisbären Berlin | DEL | 49 | 24 | 25 | 49 | 1.000 | 1.0936 | 1.1155 | — | — |
| 2012-13 | Eisbären Berlin | DEL | 34 | 15 | 17 | 32 | 0.941 | 1.0293 | 1.0212 | — | — |
| 2013-14 | Eisbären Berlin | DEL | 51 | 12 | 25 | 37 | 0.726 | 0.7934 | 0.7709 | — | — |
| 2014-15 | Eisbären Berlin | DEL | 52 | 10 | 26 | 36 | 0.692 | 0.7571 | 0.7067 | — | — |
| 2015-16 | Eisbären Berlin | DEL | 49 | 14 | 26 | 40 | 0.816 | 0.8927 | 0.7869 | — | — |
| 2016-17 | Eisbären Berlin | DEL | 40 | 13 | 18 | 31 | 0.775 | 0.8475 | 0.7309 | — | — |
| 2017-18 | ERC Ingolstadt | DEL | 52 | 17 | 19 | 36 | 0.692 | 0.7571 | 0.6397 | — | — |
| 2018-19 | ERC Ingolstadt | DEL | 46 | 9 | 14 | 23 | 0.500 | 0.5468 | 0.4124 | — | — |
| 2019-20 | ERC Ingolstadt | DEL | 47 | 2 | 11 | 13 | 0.277 | 0.3025 | 0.3025 | — | — |
| 2020-21 | Schwenninger Wild Wings | DEL | 15 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0.400 | 0.4374 | 0.4374 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-07 | Northern Michigan | D1 | — | SR | 41 | 14 | 20 | 34 | 0.829 |
| 2005-06 | Northern Michigan | D1 | — | JR | 36 | 15 | 20 | 35 | 0.972 |
| 2004-05 | Northern Michigan | D1 | — | SO | 40 | 9 | 34 | 43 | 1.075 |
| 2003-04 | Northern Michigan | D1 | — | FR | 41 | 13 | 20 | 33 | 0.805 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.