IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jonathan Sigalet Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1986-02-12 Country: Canada
2005 · Round 4, Pick #100  ·  Boston Bruins Boston Bruins
Signed Professionally
SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 52 13 39 52 1.000 0.3853 0.4258 1.4553 1.6084
2011-12 Lev Poprad KHL 49 1 7 8 0.163 0.4083 0.4445 2.2501 2.4495
2012-13 HC Slovan Bratislava KHL 45 3 9 12 0.267 0.6667 0.6870 3.6748 3.7865
2013-14 HC Slovan Bratislava KHL 52 1 9 10 0.192 0.4808 0.4690 2.6496 2.5845
2014-15 HC Slovan Bratislava KHL 38 0 1 1 0.026 0.0658 0.0611 0.3624 0.3365
2015-16 Luleå HF SHL 46 2 12 14 0.304 0.7608 0.6131 3.9707 3.1996
2016-17 Frölunda HC SHL 45 3 8 11 0.244 0.6110 0.4565 3.1891 2.3827
2017-18 Frölunda HC SHL 51 5 7 12 0.235 0.5883 0.4207 3.0703 2.1957
2018-19 Frölunda HC SHL 45 7 9 16 0.356 0.8890 0.5916 4.6401 3.0879
2019-20 Brynäs IF SHL 51 3 10 13 0.255 0.6373 0.6373 3.3261 3.3261
2020-21 — SHL 39 4 7 11 0.282 0.7053 0.7053 3.6810 3.6810
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2004-05 Bowling Green D1 CCHA SO 35 3 13 16 0.457
2003-04 Bowling Green D1 CCHA FR 37 3 12 15 0.405
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.40
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2003-04 · Bowling Green
0.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 17 comparables)

6%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
94%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#541
Defenseman overall
#97
Defenseman born in 1986

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Gus Katsuras
Hamilton · 2001-02
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Ellis
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.