IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Kozek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-05-26 Country: Canada
2005 · Round 2, Pick #53  ·  Atlanta Thrashers
Signed Professionally
Ravensburg Towerstars · DEL2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Surrey Eagles BCHL 58 19 22 41 0.707 0.2724 0.2928 1.0288 1.1057
2004-05 Surrey Eagles BCHL 60 48 49 97 1.617 0.6229 0.6404 2.3528 2.4189
2016-17 Nürnberg Ice Tigers DEL 50 16 12 28 0.560 1.4000 1.2931 4.7478 4.3851
2017-18 Sport Liiga 7 2 0 2 0.286 0.7143 0.5185 2.4559 1.7827
2020-21 Ravensburg Towerstars DEL2 15 5 5 10 0.667 0.8931 0.8931 1.1963 1.1963
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 North Dakota D1 NCHC SR 38 8 12 20 0.526
2007-08 North Dakota D1 NCHC JR 42 18 3 21 0.500
2006-07 North Dakota D1 NCHC SO 41 5 6 11 0.268
2005-06 North Dakota D1 NCHC FR 46 7 6 13 0.283
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.47
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2005-06 · North Dakota
-39.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 18 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6840
Forward overall
#248
Forward born in 1986

D2/3 Comparables

Tim Coffman
Utica · 2023-24
1.480 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arvega Hovsepyan
Salve Regina · 2023-24
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Quinn Waller
Adrian · 2006-07
1.586 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.