← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ronnie Smith Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-11-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2004-05 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1862 0.2144 0.7286 0.8388
2005-06 Coquitlam Express BCHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2006-07 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 56 11 13 24 0.429 0.1597 0.1673 0.6245 0.6541
2007-08 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 55 9 28 37 0.673 0.2506 0.2490 0.9802 0.9739
2008-09 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 60 12 19 31 0.517 0.1925 0.1832 0.7529 0.7164
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 28 3 6 9 0.321
2011-12 Manhattanville D3 JR 25 3 12 15 0.600
2010-11 Manhattanville D3 SO 26 3 7 10 0.385
2009-10 Manhattanville D3 FR 4 0 1 1 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2009-10 · Manhattanville
+39.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27641
Forward overall
#935
Forward born in 1988
#1695
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2012-13
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2004-05
1.240 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2010-11
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.