| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-05 | Salmon Arm Silverbacks | BCHL | 57 | 48 | 43 | 91 | 1.597 | 0.5947 | 0.5857 | 2.3263 | 2.2911 |
| 2013-14 | EHC München | DEL | 49 | 12 | 20 | 32 | 0.653 | 0.7142 | 0.7068 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-09 | North Dakota | D1 | — | SR | 43 | 20 | 19 | 39 | 0.907 |
| 2007-08 | North Dakota | D1 | — | JR | 43 | 18 | 22 | 40 | 0.930 |
| 2006-07 | North Dakota | D1 | — | SO | 43 | 31 | 26 | 57 | 1.326 |
| 2005-06 | North Dakota | D1 | — | FR | 46 | 16 | 20 | 36 | 0.783 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.