| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002-03 | Humboldt Broncos | SJHL | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.500 | 0.1281 | 0.1486 | 0.3769 | 0.4371 |
| 2004-05 | Vernon Vipers | BCHL | 60 | 36 | 38 | 74 | 1.233 | 0.4752 | 0.5003 | 1.7948 | 1.8895 |
| 2015-16 | KooKoo | Liiga | 58 | 2 | 10 | 12 | 0.207 | 0.5172 | 0.4514 | 1.7785 | 1.5522 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-09 | North Dakota | D1 | NCHC | SR | 41 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 0.342 |
| 2007-08 | North Dakota | D1 | NCHC | JR | 43 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 0.419 |
| 2006-07 | North Dakota | D1 | NCHC | SO | 38 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 0.447 |
| 2005-06 | North Dakota | D1 | NCHC | FR | 46 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 0.196 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.