← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Guévin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-01-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 6 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 53 7 38 45 0.849 0.5009 0.5009 2.5479 2.5479
2021-22 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 59 6 51 57 0.966 0.5699 0.5629 2.8990 2.8635
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC — 36 7 13 20 0.556
2023-24 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC — 40 3 10 13 0.325
2022-23 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC — 36 4 14 18 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.58
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2022-23 · Nebraska Omaha
-13.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

78%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#961
Defenseman overall
#133
Defenseman born in 2003
#238
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2017-18
1.667 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2004-05
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2023-24
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.