| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | Coquitlam Express | BCHL | 57 | 36 | 36 | 72 | 1.263 | 0.4867 | 0.5544 | 1.8383 | 2.0939 |
| 2006-07 | Coquitlam Express | BCHL | 53 | 66 | 55 | 121 | 2.283 | 0.8796 | 0.9547 | 3.3224 | 3.6059 |
| 2012-13 | Kärpät | Liiga | 21 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 0.905 | 2.2620 | 2.6480 | 7.7778 | 9.1051 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08 | Wisconsin | D1 | BigTen | FR | 36 | 11 | 24 | 35 | 0.972 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.