IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Wade MacLeod Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-01-20 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Löwen Frankfurt · DEL2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Merritt Centennials BCHL 41 14 27 41 1.000 0.3853 0.3894 1.4553 1.4709
2006-07 Merritt Centennials BCHL 60 51 54 105 1.750 0.6743 0.6454 2.5468 2.4375
2015-16 Starbulls Rosenheim DEL2 50 34 27 61 1.220 1.6343 1.6253 2.1892 2.1771
2017-18 Löwen Frankfurt DEL2 49 25 24 49 1.000 1.3396 1.2129 1.7944 1.6247
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SR 38 22 23 45 1.184
2009-10 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast JR 33 14 16 30 0.909
2008-09 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SO 41 14 21 35 0.854
2007-08 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast FR 37 11 16 27 0.730
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.51
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.73
2007-08 · Northeastern
+44.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 16 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#5503
Forward overall
#216
Forward born in 1987

D2/3 Comparables

Tim Coffman
Utica · 2023-24
1.480 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Bloom
University of New England · 2016-17
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Shaquille Merasty
Adrian · 2015-16
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.