Wade MacLeod Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-01-20 Country: Canada

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2005-06	Merritt Centennials	BCHL	41	14	27	41	1.000	0.3725	0.3765	1.4571	1.4727
2006-07	Merritt Centennials	BCHL	60	51	54	105	1.750	0.6519	0.6239	2.5499	2.4405
2015-16	Starbulls Rosenheim	DEL2	50	34	27	61	1.220	0.5263	0.5234	—	—
2017-18	Löwen Frankfurt	DEL2	49	25	24	49	1.000	0.4314	0.3906	—	—

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2010-11	Northeastern	D1	HockeyEast	SR	38	22	23	45	1.184
2009-10	Northeastern	D1	HockeyEast	JR	33	14	16	30	0.909
2008-09	Northeastern	D1	HockeyEast	SO	41	14	21	35	0.854
2007-08	Northeastern	D1	HockeyEast	FR	37	11	16	27	0.730

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.49

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.73

2007-08 · Northeastern

+49.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 27 comparables)

15%

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

85%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5232

Forward overall

#205

Forward born in 1987

D2/3 Comparables

Jason Kalinowski

Endicott · 2015-16

1.310 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Jason Yuel

Curry · 2006-07

1.769 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Nick Ford

Elmira · 2014-15

0.800 Strong

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.