| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001-02 | USNTDP Juniors | USHL | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.500 | 0.2949 | 0.3215 | 1.4969 | 1.6321 |
| 2012-13 | Augsburger Panther | DEL | 48 | 13 | 22 | 35 | 0.729 | 1.8230 | 1.7566 | 6.1821 | 5.9569 |
| 2013-14 | Augsburger Panther | DEL | 46 | 8 | 26 | 34 | 0.739 | 1.8478 | 1.7426 | 6.2660 | 5.9093 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | UMass | D1 | HockeyEast | SR | 35 | 13 | 14 | 27 | 0.771 |
| 2004-05 | UMass | D1 | HockeyEast | JR | 38 | 14 | 13 | 27 | 0.711 |
| 2003-04 | UMass | D1 | HockeyEast | SO | 33 | 7 | 17 | 24 | 0.727 |
| 2002-03 | UMass | D1 | HockeyEast | FR | 37 | 16 | 22 | 38 | 1.027 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.