IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kellen Jones Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-08-16 Country: Canada
2010 · Round 7, Pick #202  ·  Edmonton Oilers Edmonton Oilers
Signed Professionally
Västerviks IK · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Vernon Vipers BCHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1926 0.2187 0.7277 0.8264
2007-08 Vernon Vipers BCHL 60 12 55 67 1.117 0.4303 0.4655 1.6251 1.7579
2008-09 Vernon Vipers BCHL 51 15 37 52 1.020 0.3929 0.4085 1.4838 1.5427
2009-10 Vernon Vipers BCHL 41 12 41 53 1.293 0.4981 0.4907 1.8813 1.8533
2018-19 Västerviks IK Allsvenskan 52 14 16 30 0.577 1.4423 1.2027 5.4124 4.5134
2020-21 Västerviks IK Allsvenskan 51 10 14 24 0.471 1.1765 1.1765 4.4151 4.4151
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC SR 40 18 24 42 1.050
2012-13 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC JR 43 13 14 27 0.628
2011-12 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC SO 36 14 22 36 1.000
2010-11 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC FR 38 8 14 22 0.579
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.39
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2010-11 · Quinnipiac
+47.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 20 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#1194
Forward overall
#58
Forward born in 1990

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.