← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Mittelstadt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-10-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Eden Prairie USHS-MN 31 20 38 58 1.871 0.5037 0.5037 0.4545 0.4545
2020-21 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 45 7 10 17 0.378 0.2322 0.2322 1.1131 1.1131
2021-22 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 62 12 15 27 0.435 0.2677 0.2480 1.2831 1.1889
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minnesota D1 BigTen SR 36 1 3 4 0.111
2024-25 Minnesota D1 BigTen 35 3 5 8 0.229
2023-24 Minnesota D1 BigTen 33 1 1 2 0.061
2022-23 Minnesota D1 BigTen 30 4 1 5 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2022-23 · Minnesota
-44.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14760
Forward overall
#665
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2001-02
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2008-09
1.333 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2006-07
1.036 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.