← New Search ↗ Social Card

Harrison Follett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-11-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs USPHL-Premier 38 5 4 9 0.237 0.0310 0.0312 0.0804 0.0810
2023-24 WB/Scranton Knights USPHL-Premier 32 1 6 7 0.219 0.0286 0.0274 0.0743 0.0713
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Davenport University ACHA_D1 7 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Davenport University ACHA_D1 7 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Misericordia D3 MAC 1 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Davenport University ACHA_D1 7 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Davenport University ACHA_D1 7 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Davenport University ACHA_D1 7 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Davenport University ACHA_D1 7 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#52466
Forward overall
#3555
Forward born in 2003
#5721
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nichols · 2021-22
0.077 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2017-18
0.100 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2014-15
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.