← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ike Frankel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-10-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Northwest Express USPHL-Premier 39 18 25 43 1.103 0.1244 0.1244 0.3743 0.3743
2020-21 Northwest Express USPHL-Premier 42 22 31 53 1.262 0.1423 0.1423 0.4284 0.4284
2021-22 Northwest Express USPHL-Premier 43 16 24 40 0.930 0.1049 0.1003 0.3158 0.3020
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 24 5 2 7 0.292
2024-25 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 11 2 1 3 0.273
2023-24 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 18 0 6 6 0.333
2022-23 Nichols D3 CNE 13 1 0 1 0.077
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2022-23 · Nichols
-10.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11767
Forward overall
#535
Forward born in 2001
#590
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2011-12
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2002-03
0.471 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
New England · 2015-16
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.