← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Erickson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-11-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Battlefords North Stars SJHL 51 2 25 27 0.529 0.1356 0.1371 0.3991 0.4036
2014-15 Battlefords North Stars SJHL 53 5 22 27 0.509 0.1305 0.1251 0.3840 0.3682
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Norwich D3 LittleEast 22 0 4 4 0.182
2017-18 Norwich D3 LittleEast 25 2 5 7 0.280
2016-17 Norwich D3 LittleEast 28 3 1 4 0.143
2015-16 Air Force D1 AHA 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#10055
Defenseman overall
#1395
Defenseman born in 1994
#819
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2012-13
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2021-22
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2008-09
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.