← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Morley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-12-19 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Grizzlys Wolfsburg · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Surrey Eagles BCHL 50 7 11 18 0.360 0.1387 0.1535 0.5236 0.5795
2009-10 Surrey Eagles BCHL 53 19 18 37 0.698 0.2690 0.2830 1.0153 1.0683
2010-11 Surrey Eagles BCHL 47 13 23 36 0.766 0.2951 0.2967 1.1141 1.1201
2011-12 Surrey Eagles BCHL 58 28 37 65 1.121 0.4318 0.4104 1.6299 1.5490
2018-19 SaiPa Liiga 57 17 24 41 0.719 1.7983 1.7386 6.1819 5.9767
2019-20 Tappara Liiga 37 14 24 38 1.027 2.5675 2.5675 8.8263 8.8263
2020-21 — SHL 53 5 14 19 0.358 0.8962 0.8962 4.6750 4.6750
2021-22 Tappara Liiga 48 12 23 35 0.729 1.8230 1.4091 6.2670 4.8442
2022-23 Grizzlys Wolfsburg DEL 49 16 29 45 0.918 2.2960 2.0314 7.7846 6.8873
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA SR 29 18 12 30 1.034
2014-15 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA JR 32 15 22 37 1.156
2013-14 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA — 31 17 17 34 1.097
2012-13 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA FR 37 10 11 21 0.568
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2012-13 · Alaska Fairbanks
+81.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 33 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#891
Forward overall
#40
Forward born in 1991

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.