Curtis Gedig Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1991-09-14 Country: Canada

2009 · Round 7, Pick #204 ·

New Jersey Devils

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2008-09	—	BCHL	46	4	14	18	0.391	0.1508	0.1649	0.5695	0.6228
2009-10	—	BCHL	53	11	10	21	0.396	0.1527	0.1587	0.5766	0.5991
2018-19	Fischtown Pinguins	DEL	14	0	2	2	0.143	0.3573	0.3861	1.2115	1.3090
2019-20	EC Kassel Huskies	DEL2	2	0	0	0	0.000	—	—	—	—

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2013-14	Ohio State	D1	BigTen	SR	33	2	8	10	0.303
2012-13	Ohio State	D1	CCHA-orig	JR	32	3	12	15	0.469
2011-12	Ohio State	D1	CCHA-orig	SO	34	2	12	14	0.412
2010-11	Ohio State	D1	CCHA-orig	FR	34	0	12	12	0.353

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.15

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.35

2010-11 · Ohio State

+131.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 23 comparables)

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

87%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10685

Defenseman overall

#1277

Defenseman born in 1991

D2/3 Comparables

Ben Blasko

Nazareth · 2017-18

1.000 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Ryan Bloom

University of New England · 2017-18

1.654 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Shaquille Merasty

Adrian · 2015-16

1.357 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.