IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mitchell Wolfe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-07-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Andover USHS-MN 31 13 27 40 1.290 0.3473 0.3473 0.3134 0.3134
2020-21 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 50 1 10 11 0.220 0.1352 0.1352 0.6482 0.6482
2021-22 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 54 7 16 23 0.426 0.2618 0.2521 1.2548 1.2082
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bemidji State D1 CCHA — 36 2 5 7 0.194
2024-25 Bemidji State D1 CCHA JR 38 2 6 8 0.210
2023-24 Bemidji State D1 CCHA SO 38 1 12 13 0.342
2022-23 Bemidji State D1 CCHA FR 26 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

62%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4693
Defenseman overall
#1231
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Mike McKee
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Niklas Nevalainen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mathew Thompson
Adrian · 2012-13
1.536 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Braden Desmet
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
1.391 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Matthews
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.