| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Alberni Valley Bulldogs | BCHL | 59 | 26 | 54 | 80 | 1.356 | 0.5224 | 0.5522 | 1.9732 | 2.0857 |
| 2010-11 | Penticton Vees | BCHL | 40 | 21 | 36 | 57 | 1.425 | 0.5491 | 0.5547 | 2.0738 | 2.0948 |
| 2018-19 | Tingsryds AIF | Allsvenskan | 11 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.091 | 0.2272 | 0.2058 | 0.8528 | 0.7724 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | North Dakota | D1 | NCHC | SR | 29 | 16 | 9 | 25 | 0.862 |
| 2013-14 | North Dakota | D1 | NCHC | JR | 38 | 10 | 16 | 26 | 0.684 |
| 2012-13 | North Dakota | D1 | WCHA-orig | SO | 42 | 13 | 12 | 25 | 0.595 |
| 2011-12 | North Dakota | D1 | WCHA-orig | FR | 42 | 7 | 16 | 23 | 0.548 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.