IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joel Lowry Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-11-15 Country: Canada
2011 · Round 5, Pick #140  ·  Los Angeles Kings Los Angeles Kings
Signed Professionally
EC Kassel Huskies · DEL2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2009-10 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 57 15 29 44 0.772 0.2974 0.3115 1.1233 1.1767
2010-11 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 42 24 43 67 1.595 0.6146 0.6150 2.3215 2.3232
2020-21 Iserlohn Roosters DEL 28 7 5 12 0.429 1.0715 1.0715 3.6338 3.6338
2022-23 EC Kassel Huskies DEL2 48 14 30 44 0.917 1.2280 0.9604 1.6449 1.2864
2023-24 EC Kassel Huskies DEL2 49 16 27 43 0.878 1.1756 0.8863 1.5748 1.1872
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Cornell D1 ECAC SR 11 4 4 8 0.727
2013-14 Cornell D1 ECAC JR 32 7 17 24 0.750
2012-13 Cornell D1 ECAC SO 33 12 11 23 0.697
2011-12 Cornell D1 ECAC FR 35 6 16 22 0.629
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.42
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.63
2011-12 · Cornell
+48.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9030
Forward overall
#359
Forward born in 1991

D2/3 Comparables

Rihards Marenis
Aurora · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Blasko
Nazareth · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Shaquille Merasty
Adrian · 2016-17
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.