← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Larrigan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-04-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 41 3 6 9 0.220 0.1295 0.1295 0.6592 0.6592
2021-22 Lincoln Stars USHL 17 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Lincoln Stars USHL 59 5 22 27 0.458 0.2699 0.2691 1.3744 1.3704
2023-24 Lincoln Stars USHL 55 11 21 32 0.582 0.3432 0.3252 1.7474 1.6556
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Notre Dame D1 BigTen SO 7 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Notre Dame D1 BigTen 29 1 5 6 0.207
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2024-25 · Notre Dame
-20.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

78%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21189
Forward overall
#1151
Forward born in 2004
#2073
in USHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2013-14
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2005-06
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2013-14
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.