| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Quesnel Millionaires | BCHL | 32 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 0.375 | 0.1445 | 0.1373 | 0.5454 | 0.5182 |
| 2013-14 | Univ. of Western Ontario | USports-M | 23 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.043 | 0.0230 | 0.0218 | 0.1275 | 0.1208 |
| 2014-15 | Univ. of Western Ontario | USports-M | 12 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.250 | 0.1319 | 0.1182 | 0.7326 | 0.6564 |
| 2015-16 | Univ. of Western Ontario | USports-M | 9 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.222 | 0.1172 | 0.0992 | 0.6511 | 0.5513 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | Providence | D1 | HockeyEast | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2010-11 | Elmira | D3 | UCHC | FR | 22 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0.273 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.