← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matthew Herskovitz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1989-12-03 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Univ. of Western Ontario · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Quesnel Millionaires BCHL 32 6 6 12 0.375 0.1445 0.1373 0.5454 0.5182
2013-14 Univ. of Western Ontario USports-M 23 1 0 1 0.043 0.0230 0.0218 0.1275 0.1208
2014-15 Univ. of Western Ontario USports-M 12 1 2 3 0.250 0.1319 0.1182 0.7326 0.6564
2015-16 Univ. of Western Ontario USports-M 9 0 2 2 0.222 0.1172 0.0992 0.6511 0.5513
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Providence D1 HockeyEast — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2010-11 Elmira D3 UCHC FR 22 1 5 6 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2010-11 · Elmira
+110.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17418
Defenseman overall
#1575
Defenseman born in 1989

D2/3 Comparables

Framingham State · 2013-14
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2017-18
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2005-06
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.