IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Erik Cooper Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-10-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Surrey Eagles BCHL 53 2 6 8 0.151 0.0581 0.0607 0.2196 0.2296
2010-11 — BCHL 59 14 18 32 0.542 0.2090 0.2087 0.7894 0.7882
2011-12 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 60 19 30 49 0.817 0.3147 0.2969 1.1885 1.1214
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 31 13 23 36 1.161
2014-15 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 28 11 8 19 0.679
2013-14 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 32 16 21 37 1.156
2012-13 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 24 6 10 16 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2012-13 · St. Norbert
+197.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26139
Forward overall
#942
Forward born in 1991
#1390
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kerry Barchan
Buffalo State · 2006-07
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tommy Malkmus
Finlandia · 2013-14
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ross Olsson
Endicott · 2014-15
1.364 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.