IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Drew Montgomery Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-03-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Tri-City Storm USHL 29 2 4 6 0.207 0.1272 0.1272 0.6096 0.6096
2021-22 Tri-City Storm USHL 55 6 9 15 0.273 0.1676 0.1671 0.8034 0.8012
2022-23 — USHL 58 10 17 27 0.466 0.2861 0.2704 1.3715 1.2964
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Colorado College D1 NCHC JR 34 8 8 16 0.471
2024-25 Colorado College D1 NCHC JR 34 10 8 18 0.529
2023-24 Colorado College D1 NCHC SO 35 5 5 10 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2023-24 · Colorado College
+45.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26337
Forward overall
#1485
Forward born in 2003
#2569
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cameron Brown
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jason Murfitt
Manhattanville · 2002-03
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Perkins
Finlandia · 2018-19
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Pier-Olivier Cotnoir
Norwich · 2008-09
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.