Mike Zalewski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-08-18 Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2010-11	Vernon Vipers	BCHL	46	12	17	29	0.630	0.2429	0.2523	0.9174	0.9528
2011-12	Vernon Vipers	BCHL	60	38	37	75	1.250	0.4816	0.4737	1.8191	1.7894
2017-18	Straubing Tigers	DEL	51	14	17	31	0.608	1.5195	1.8502	5.1530	6.2746
2018-19	Kölner Haie	DEL	44	5	13	18	0.409	1.0228	1.1526	3.4684	3.9084
2020-21	Kölner Haie	DEL	38	3	9	12	0.316	0.7895	0.7895	2.6774	2.6774

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2013-14	RPI	D1	ECAC	—	35	9	17	26	0.743
2012-13	RPI	D1	ECAC	—	36	12	9	21	0.583

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.33

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.58

2012-13 · RPI

+76.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 20 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

100%

NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#7265

Forward overall

#336

Forward born in 1992

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm

Neumann · 2003-04

1.800 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Arkhip Ledenkov

St. Scholastica · 2018-19

1.636 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Brandon Osmundson

Utica · 2018-19

1.448 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.