IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jedd Soleway Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-05-12 Country: Canada
2013 · Round 7, Pick #193  ·  Phoenix Coyotes
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Vernon Vipers BCHL 58 13 12 25 0.431 0.1661 0.1778 0.6272 0.6712
2012-13 — BCHL 48 19 27 46 0.958 0.3692 0.3777 1.3946 1.4265
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Wisconsin D1 BigTen SR 9 0 1 1 0.111
2015-16 Wisconsin D1 BigTen JR 32 6 4 10 0.312
2014-15 Wisconsin D1 BigTen SO 35 7 2 9 0.257
2013-14 Wisconsin D1 BigTen FR 35 1 7 8 0.229
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2013-14 · Wisconsin
-10.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18461
Forward overall
#731
Forward born in 1994
#841
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Hawkins
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Drew Smolcynski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Montgomery
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha
0.34 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Steman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ray Pigozzi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ UMass (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kyle Gallegos
Tufts · 2008-09
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Peters
UMass Boston · 2015-16
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2001-02
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.