← New Search ↗ Social Card

Greg Moore Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-03-26 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Grizzlys Wolfsburg · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 USNTDP Juniors USHL 12 2 2 4 0.333 0.2049 0.2196 0.9820 1.0525
2011-12 Augsburger Panther DEL 52 20 10 30 0.577 0.6309 0.6138
2012-13 Grizzlys Wolfsburg DEL 50 13 17 30 0.600 0.6562 0.6202
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Elmira D3 SR 29 2 15 17 0.586
2008-09 Elmira D3 JR 27 1 9 10 0.370
2007-08 Elmira D3 SO 26 3 8 11 0.423
2006-07 Elmira D3 FR 27 0 8 8 0.296
2005-06 Maine D1 HockeyEast SR 42 28 17 45 1.071
2004-05 Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 40 14 9 23 0.575
2003-04 Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 39 15 8 23 0.590
2002-03 Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 33 9 7 16 0.485
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2002-03 · Maine
+157.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4626
Forward overall
#139
Forward born in 1984

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2000-01
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
New England · 2015-16
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.