Myles Powell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-07-24 Country: Canada

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2011-12	—	BCHL	41	6	8	14	0.342	0.1316	0.1422	0.4970	0.5369
2012-13	Victoria Grizzlies	BCHL	52	17	18	35	0.673	0.2593	0.2678	0.9796	1.0118
2013-14	Cowichan Valley Capitals	BCHL	58	21	38	59	1.017	0.3919	0.3867	1.4803	1.4606
2021-22	—	Allsvenskan	40	17	27	44	1.100	2.7500	2.4788	10.3201	9.3023
2022-23	IK Oskarshamn	SHL	50	9	6	15	0.300	0.7500	0.7053	3.9146	3.6814
2023-24	IF Björklöven	Allsvenskan	41	20	23	43	1.049	2.6220	2.1454	9.8397	8.0512
2024-25	ERC Ingolstadt	DEL	52	14	32	46	0.885	2.2115	2.0285	7.4998	6.8792
2025-26	ERC Ingolstadt	DEL	42	17	21	38	0.905	2.2620	2.1807	7.6711	7.3954

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2017-18	RIT	D1	AHA	SR	37	13	26	39	1.054
2016-17	RIT	D1	AHA	JR	37	13	11	24	0.649
2015-16	RIT	D1	AHA	SO	39	15	17	32	0.821
2014-15	RIT	D1	AHA	FR	36	4	6	10	0.278

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.29

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.28

2014-15 · RIT

-4.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

100%

NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#662

Forward overall

#39

Forward born in 1994

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm

Neumann · 2003-04

1.800 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Arkhip Ledenkov

St. Scholastica · 2018-19

1.636 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Brandon Osmundson

Utica · 2018-19

1.448 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.