← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Humphrey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-01-18 Country: USA
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Rochester Monarchs NCDC 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.1019 0.1142 0.2009 0.2252
2019-20 Lawrence Academy NE-Prep 27 4 10 14 0.518 0.1027 0.1027 0.2362 0.2362
2020-21 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 38 16 15 31 0.816 0.2997 0.2997 3.0034 3.0034
2021-22 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 62 11 17 28 0.452 0.2664 0.2499 1.3563 1.2721
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA 6 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA 30 2 6 8 0.267
2023-24 Sacred Heart D1 AHA 23 2 4 6 0.261
2022-23 Sacred Heart D1 AHA 37 4 10 14 0.378
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2022-23 · Sacred Heart
+131.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

70%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England College · 2016-17
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2001-02
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2000-01
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.