Jace Hennig Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-01-04 Country: Canada

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2011-12	Coquitlam Express	BCHL	28	2	10	12	0.429	0.1651	0.1820	0.6237	0.6877
2012-13	—	BCHL	44	5	10	15	0.341	0.1313	0.1386	0.4961	0.5236
2013-14	Coquitlam Express	BCHL	55	13	22	35	0.636	0.2452	0.2474	0.9262	0.9347
2018-19	EC Kassel Huskies	DEL2	52	9	10	19	0.365	0.4895	0.5562	0.6557	0.7450

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2017-18	Merrimack	D1	HockeyEast	SR	37	11	14	25	0.676
2016-17	Merrimack	D1	HockeyEast	JR	36	8	14	22	0.611
2015-16	Merrimack	D1	HockeyEast	SO	38	5	6	11	0.289
2014-15	Merrimack	D1	HockeyEast	FR	37	14	7	21	0.568

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.17

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.57

2014-15 · Merrimack

+225.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

88%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32286

Forward overall

#1306

Forward born in 1995

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan McDonald

Framingham State · 2011-12

0.818 Strong

actual D2/3 PPG

Luke Simpson

St. Scholastica · 2017-18

0.929 Strong

actual D2/3 PPG

Samuel Lozinski

Albertus Magnus · 2024-25

0.706 Strong

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.