IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Plant Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-05-09 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
IF Björklöven · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 4 2 1 3 0.750 0.2890 0.3236 1.0915 1.2222
2012-13 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 46 5 23 28 0.609 0.2345 0.2515 0.8858 0.9500
2013-14 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 54 5 29 34 0.630 0.2426 0.2490 0.9163 0.9404
2019-20 — Allsvenskan 45 2 18 20 0.444 1.1110 1.1110 4.1693 4.1693
2020-21 IF Björklöven Allsvenskan 29 2 3 5 0.172 0.4310 0.4310 1.6174 1.6174
2021-22 IF Björklöven Allsvenskan 22 1 6 7 0.318 0.7955 0.7485 2.9853 2.8091
2022-23 IF Björklöven Allsvenskan 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Denver D1 NCHC SR 32 6 5 11 0.344
2016-17 Denver D1 NCHC JR 43 3 10 13 0.302
2015-16 Denver D1 NCHC SO 39 2 6 8 0.205
2014-15 Denver D1 NCHC FR 40 1 9 10 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2014-15 · Denver
+5.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#489
Defenseman overall
#151
Defenseman born in 1995

D2/3 Comparables

Conor Landrigan
Utica · 2016-17
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Joona Juntunen
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2023-24
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Ellis
SUNY Oswego · 2004-05
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.