← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Flammang Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-11-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 10 4 5 9 0.900 0.3307 0.3307 0.9500 0.9500
2020-21 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 6 1 1 2 0.333 0.1966 0.1966 1.0010 1.0010
2021-22 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 62 27 19 46 0.742 0.4376 0.4063 2.2282 2.0686
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bemidji State D1 CCHA SR 29 8 20 28 0.966
2024-25 Bemidji State D1 CCHA JR 38 5 13 18 0.474
2023-24 Bemidji State D1 CCHA SO 38 9 10 19 0.500
2022-23 Bemidji State D1 CCHA FR 32 5 1 6 0.188
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2022-23 · Bemidji State
-46.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

90%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7043
Forward overall
#292
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salem State · 2006-07
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2017-18
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2013-14
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.