icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Coquitlam Express | BCHL | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2012-13 | Coquitlam Express | BCHL | 46 | 6 | 20 | 26 | 0.565 | 0.2178 | 0.2376 | 0.8225 | 0.8974 |
| 2013-14 | Coquitlam Express | BCHL | 57 | 13 | 61 | 74 | 1.298 | 0.5002 | 0.5227 | 1.8893 | 1.9741 |
| 2020-21 | Ilves | Liiga | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2022-23 | AIK | Allsvenskan | 48 | 6 | 33 | 39 | 0.812 | 2.0312 | 1.8350 | 7.6228 | 6.8863 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | Northern Michigan | D1 | WCHA | SR | 38 | 7 | 28 | 35 | 0.921 |
| 2017-18 | Northern Michigan | D1 | WCHA | JR | 43 | 8 | 40 | 48 | 1.116 |
| 2015-16 | Wisconsin | D1 | BigTen | SO | 29 | 2 | 15 | 17 | 0.586 |
| 2014-15 | Wisconsin | D1 | BigTen | FR | 31 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 0.419 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.