IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brad McClure Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-08-13 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Augsburger Panther · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Penticton Vees BCHL 53 28 18 46 0.868 0.3344 0.3296 1.2631 1.2450
2013-14 Penticton Vees BCHL 58 41 39 80 1.379 0.5314 0.4992 2.0073 1.8858
2020-21 Augsburger Panther DEL 17 9 9 18 1.059 2.6470 2.6470 8.9767 8.9767
2021-22 Augsburger Panther DEL 49 10 17 27 0.551 1.3775 1.3729 4.6715 4.6560
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Minnesota State D1 WCHA SR 40 11 10 21 0.525
2016-17 Minnesota State D1 WCHA JR 39 14 14 28 0.718
2015-16 Minnesota State D1 WCHA SO 41 5 8 13 0.317
2014-15 Minnesota State D1 WCHA FR 39 15 14 29 0.744
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.37
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.74
2014-15 · Minnesota State
+101.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#2595
Forward overall
#142
Forward born in 1993

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.