IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jackson Cressey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-01-22 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Bietigheim Steelers · DEL2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Coquitlam Express BCHL 10 3 0 3 0.300 0.1118 0.1238 0.4371 0.4842
2013-14 Coquitlam Express BCHL 56 6 7 13 0.232 0.0865 0.0918 0.3382 0.3590
2014-15 Coquitlam Express BCHL 52 11 27 38 0.731 0.2722 0.2763 1.0648 1.0807
2015-16 Coquitlam Express BCHL 52 34 36 70 1.346 0.5015 0.4821 1.9615 1.8857
2022-23 EHC Freiburg DEL2 52 15 9 24 0.462 0.1991 0.1974 — —
2023-24 Bietigheim Steelers DEL2 47 18 21 39 0.830 0.3580 0.3448 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Princeton D1 ECAC SR 31 6 16 22 0.710
2018-19 Princeton D1 ECAC JR 31 6 17 23 0.742
2017-18 Princeton D1 ECAC SO 36 13 25 38 1.056
2016-17 Princeton D1 ECAC FR 34 7 26 33 0.971
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.97
2016-17 · Princeton
+183.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
80%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12366
Forward overall
#508
Forward born in 1996

D2/3 Comparables

Collin Patterson
UMass Dartmouth · 2022-23
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor McCloy
Adrian · 2013-14
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Rick Cleaver
Norwich · 2003-04
1.235 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.