← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Pierre Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-04-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Hill-Murray USHS-MN 31 25 34 59 1.903 0.2409 0.2409 0.4621 0.4621
2020-21 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 22 1 0 1 0.045 0.0268 0.0268 0.1365 0.1365
2021-22 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 60 17 16 33 0.550 0.3244 0.3403 1.6504 1.7315
2022-23 — USHL 56 10 12 22 0.393 0.2318 0.2311 1.1790 1.1756
2023-24 Omaha Lancers USHL 57 25 13 38 0.667 0.3933 0.3726 2.0006 1.8955
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2026-27 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2025-26 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast SO 39 13 12 25 0.641
2024-25 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast — 34 5 11 16 0.471
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2024-25 · Merrimack
+74.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

82%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13057
Forward overall
#609
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2013-14
1.536 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Stevenson · 2018-19
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2013-14
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.