IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Pierre Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-04-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Hill-Murray USHS-MN 31 25 34 59 1.903 0.5123 0.5123 0.4623 0.4623
2020-21 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 22 1 0 1 0.045 0.0290 0.0290 0.1363 0.1363
2021-22 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 60 17 16 33 0.550 0.3502 0.3674 1.6482 1.7292
2022-23 — USHL 56 10 12 22 0.393 0.2502 0.2495 1.1774 1.1740
2023-24 Omaha Lancers USHL 57 25 13 38 0.667 0.4246 0.4023 1.9979 1.8929
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast — 39 13 12 25 0.641
2024-25 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast — 34 5 11 16 0.471
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2024-25 · Merrimack
+61.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

80%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7364
Forward overall
#306
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Charlie O'Connor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Foster
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Robbie Payne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Phil Marinaccio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Heinonen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mathew Thompson
Adrian · 2013-14
1.536 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor McCloy
Adrian · 2013-14
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Master
Stevenson · 2018-19
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.