← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Robertson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-09-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.3716 0.3716 1.8749 1.8749
2021-22 — USHL 55 2 14 16 0.291 0.1716 0.1838 0.8729 0.9351
2022-23 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 61 3 42 45 0.738 0.4352 0.4436 2.2136 2.2563
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Cornell D1 ECAC — 36 2 13 15 0.417
2023-24 Cornell D1 ECAC — 35 5 18 23 0.657
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.66
2023-24 · Cornell
+104.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

90%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2575
Defenseman overall
#603
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Denver (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.64 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.95 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wilkes · 2016-17
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2016-17
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2022-23
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.