Sheldon Rempal Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-08-07 Country: Canada

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2012-13	Okotoks Oilers	AJHL	3	1	0	1	0.333	0.1118	0.1213	0.3084	0.3347
2013-14	Nanaimo Clippers	BCHL	58	22	28	50	0.862	0.3322	0.3450	1.2546	1.3030
2014-15	Nanaimo Clippers	BCHL	53	29	24	53	1.000	0.3853	0.3822	1.4553	1.4436
2015-16	Nanaimo Clippers	BCHL	56	59	51	110	1.964	0.7568	0.7102	2.8586	2.6824
2024-25	Salavat Yulaev Ufa	KHL	68	31	30	61	0.897	2.2428	1.9653	12.3609	10.8314

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2017-18	Clarkson	D1	ECAC	SO	39	23	23	46	1.179
2016-17	Clarkson	D1	ECAC	FR	39	11	12	23	0.590

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.54

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.59

2016-17 · Clarkson

+9.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

100%

NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#691

Forward overall

#44

Forward born in 1995

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm

Neumann · 2003-04

1.800 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Arkhip Ledenkov

St. Scholastica · 2018-19

1.636 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Brandon Osmundson

Utica · 2018-19

1.448 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.