IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Devin Brosseau Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-07-04 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Amur Khabarovsk · KHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 54 20 17 37 0.685 0.2640 0.2730 0.9972 1.0310
2014-15 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 34 11 22 33 0.971 0.3740 0.3693 1.4125 1.3946
2015-16 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 56 27 57 84 1.500 0.5779 0.5396 2.1829 2.0382
2022-23 Shanghai Dragons KHL 60 14 5 19 0.317 0.7917 0.7578 4.3637 4.1766
2023-24 Shanghai Dragons KHL 67 23 12 35 0.522 1.3060 1.1769 7.1980 6.4866
2024-25 Amur Khabarovsk KHL 33 13 9 22 0.667 1.6667 1.4527 9.1863 8.0069
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Clarkson D1 ECAC SR 28 8 21 29 1.036
2018-19 Clarkson D1 ECAC JR 38 14 15 29 0.763
2017-18 Clarkson D1 ECAC SO 40 11 22 33 0.825
2016-17 Clarkson D1 ECAC FR 38 7 14 21 0.553
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.40
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.55
2016-17 · Clarkson
+36.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#665
Forward overall
#41
Forward born in 1995

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.