IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Teves Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-02-18 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
JYP · Liiga

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Merritt Centennials BCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2014-15 Merritt Centennials BCHL 57 5 28 33 0.579 0.2231 0.2161 0.8435 0.8171
2022-23 JYP Liiga 48 3 7 10 0.208 0.5208 0.4735 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Princeton D1 ECAC SR 30 3 17 20 0.667
2017-18 Princeton D1 ECAC JR 31 7 26 33 1.065
2016-17 Princeton D1 ECAC SO 34 4 21 25 0.735
2015-16 Princeton D1 ECAC FR 31 2 5 7 0.226
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2015-16 · Princeton
+10.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1785
Defenseman overall
#400
Defenseman born in 1995

D2/3 Comparables

Kevin Van Bokkelen
Lebanon Valley · 2016-17
0.550 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Miller
UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan James
Wisconsin-Superior · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.