IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colin Grannary Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-09-24 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Concordia Univ. · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Merritt Centennials BCHL 55 19 19 38 0.691 0.2662 0.2925 1.0048 1.1039
2015-16 Merritt Centennials BCHL 55 28 48 76 1.382 0.5324 0.5564 2.0097 2.1002
2018-19 Concordia Univ. USports-M 8 0 2 2 0.250 0.1319 0.1438 0.7326 0.7988
2019-20 Concordia Univ. USports-M 21 9 5 14 0.667 0.3518 0.3518 1.9536 1.9536
2020-21 Concordia Univ. USports-M 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Concordia Univ. USports-M 4 0 2 2 0.500 0.2638 0.2500 1.4651 1.3884
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC SO 11 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC FR 23 1 2 3 0.130
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.39
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.13
2016-17 · Nebraska Omaha
-66.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10302
Forward overall
#478
Forward born in 1997

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Bloom
University of New England · 2017-18
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Shaquille Merasty
Adrian · 2015-16
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Danny Liscio
SUNY Morrisville · 2014-15
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.