← New Search ↗ Social Card

Steven Jandric Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-08-18 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Lukko · Liiga

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 6 1 0 1 0.167 0.0642 0.0702 0.2429 0.2656
2015-16 Vernon Vipers BCHL 57 7 15 22 0.386 0.1487 0.1546 0.5624 0.5849
2016-17 Vernon Vipers BCHL 58 27 24 51 0.879 0.3388 0.3350 1.2812 1.2669
2023-24 Lukko Liiga 31 12 10 22 0.710 1.7742 1.7783
2024-25 Lukko Liiga 60 21 24 45 0.750 1.8750 1.8139
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast 34 8 20 28 0.824
2020-21 Denver D1 NCHC SR 20 1 5 6 0.300
2019-20 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA JR 35 13 20 33 0.943
2018-19 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA SO 36 9 15 24 0.667
2017-18 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA FR 36 4 19 23 0.639
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2017-18 · Alaska Fairbanks
+184.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#465
Forward overall
#22
Forward born in 1997

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2005-06
1.267 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2007-08
1.333 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2003-04
1.222 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.